NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot vs CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log

Integrated Bridge Systems comparison · 2 products · View all Integrated Bridge Systems

The Sperry Marine NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot and AMI Marine CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log are both integrated bridge systems products certified to MED. Key difference: Display — NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot is Graphic LCD, illuminated vs CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log at Multifunction colour display.

NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot
CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log

Specification comparison

Specification NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log
Dimensions (Front Panel) 288 x 144 mm
Installation Depth 150 mm
Weight 1.5 kg
Power Consumption 10 W
Power Supply 24 VDC (18 - 36 V)
Display Graphic LCD, illuminated Multifunction colour display
Controls Sealed foil keyboard, illuminated
Rudder Feedback 10 V, 120 deg max
Potentiometer Resistance 2 kOhm
Gyro Heading Input RS422 x 2
Magnetic Compass Input NMEA 0183, sine/cosine
NAV/Track Interface NMEA 0183
Speed Input 200 p/nm or NMEA 0183
Steering Modes Self-tuning adaptive, rate, radius, track control
Environmental Standard EN 60945 (IEC 945 +A1)
Measurement Type Speed through water (electromagnetic)
Additional Data Speed over ground from GPS, heading
Language Configurable (any language on request)

Certification comparison

Certification NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log
MED ✓ ✓
SOLAS — Not listed ✓

Other Integrated Bridge Systems comparisons

Data sources

NAVIPILOT 4000 Autopilot
Data from marinsat.com ·
View original
CLETA Electromagnetic Speed Log
Data from amimarine.com ·
View original