DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector vs AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector

Fire Detection Systems comparison · 2 products · View all Fire Detection Systems

The Hochiki DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector and Autronica Fire & Security AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector are both fire detection systems products certified to MED and SOLAS. Key difference: Detection Type — DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector is Single infrared (IR) flame detection vs AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector at Multispectrum IR (hydrogen-optimised).

DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector
AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector

Specification comparison

Specification DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector
Detection Type Single infrared (IR) flame detection Multispectrum IR (hydrogen-optimised)
Coverage Area 90-degree cone, 25m range
Voltage 15 - 30 VDC
Quiescent Current 70 uA
Alarm Current 40 mA
Surge Current 320 uA
Minimum Alarm Trip Current 6 mA
IP Rating IP42
Color Ivory
Compatible Base YBN-R/6M
Temperature Range -55 to +75 C
Protection Class IP66
Cable Entries 4 x M25

Certification comparison

Certification DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector
DNV ✓ — Not listed
MED ✓ ✓
SOLAS ✓ ✓

Other Fire Detection Systems comparisons

Data sources

DRD-EM Marine Conventional Infrared Flame Detector
Data from hochikiasiapacific.com ·
View original
AutroFlame X32AF Hydrogen Flame Detector
Data from product.autronicafire.com ·
View original